This article is the third part of a three-part series on structuring corporate transactions involving the purchase or sale of a business. In Part One of our series, we introduced high-level distinctions between stock and asset sales, HERE. In Part Two, we analyzed stock sales, HERE. In today's article, we analyze asset sales.
Asset Sale Advantages
An asset deal is a transaction where the buyer buys the business’s assets and it’s contractual liabilities directly from the company, not from the company’s shareholders. These assets usually include things like inventory, furniture, real estate, intellectual property, accounts receivable and contracts.
This requires that the deal documents clearly specify which assets and liabilities are being purchased and which assets are not being purchased. This does not mean that each asset needs to be specifically identified. Typically, transaction documents describe the type of assets that are being purchased.
In an asset deal, the tax advantages to the buyer can be substantial. For example, the buyer can receive a stepped-up cost basis for the assets it is purchasing if the purchase price exceeds the seller’s cost basis. And the buyer can depreciate the amount of goodwill that the buyer is paying in the transaction. Goodwill is the amount of the purchase price that exceeds the net fair market value of the assets being purchased. However, asset deals cannot qualify for tax treatment as a tax-free reorganization. Also, with an asset sale, sales or transfer taxes may be incurred.
Furthermore, in an asset deal, the buyer can avoid purchasing certain unwanted liabilities. For example, if the buyer purchased the entire company, there is the potential that a lawsuit could arise relating to something that occurred before the buyer purchased the company. Also, in an asset deal, the buyer and the seller can agree to exclude certain assets and/or liabilities from the transaction. And the buyer can start anew with the corporate formalities of the business, such as the organizational documents, bylaws, meeting minutes, taxes, etc.
Asset Sale Disadvantages
However, there is one issue that can sometimes make an asset deal unworkable. Many contracts, permits and licenses are not easily assignable. Therefore, many of the contracts that the business has with its suppliers, customers, employees, landlords, etc. will need to be renegotiated, sometimes before the transaction can take place. While sometimes these consents and transfers can be obtained, these can delay the sale of business substantially, which is sometimes unacceptable to one or both of the parties.
Furthermore, in an asset deal, all of the company’s assets will need to be retitled. These assets can include real estate, vehicles, bank accounts, insurance policies, other investments, etc. Even when retitling these assets can be accomplished as a matter of right, the time, effort and cost of retitling the company’s assets should be considered when deciding which type of transaction is the most favorable.
Conclusion
The advantages and disadvantages above need to be carefully considered by the parties involved. It is often also a good idea to seek the advice of competent legal counsel early in the negotiation process to determine which type of deal structure would benefit you the most. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.
Common PBM Audit Triggers and How to Avoid Them
Guide independent pharmacies in recognizing and proactively managing specific behaviors and operational trends that commonly lead to PBM audits. This article will offer a detailed watchlist of PBM audit triggers and present practical, actionable steps for minimizing risks of audit findings and compliance issues.
Read More >>Navigating Informed Consent Requirements in Telehealth: A Provider’s Guide
We examine the complex requirements and risks associated with informed consent for telehealth providers. The article provides actionable advice on navigating the regulatory landscape and practical steps to ensure legal compliance and patient safety.
Read More >>Pennsylvania Board Closes Investigation of HLA Client with No Action
Telemedicine business models may prompt regulatory scrutiny, including board investigations. In this case, HLA's experienced defense attorneys successfully resolved a three-year, multi-state investigation with no licensing or other implications.
Read More >>Department of Justice Declines to Prosecute HLA Client for Alleged $6M Fraud
After the Department of Justice threatened to indict our client for involvement in an alleged $6M healthcare fraud, we stood firm and our tenacious advocacy ultimately convinced the Strike Force to decline prosecution, representing a complete win for HLA's client.
Read More >>