Our client, an Illinois pharmacy, was targeted by a major PBM with cease-and-desist notices that alleged violations of the Provider Manual. Although the pharmacy responded to the PBM in an attempt to address the allegations, the PBM terminated the pharmacy anyway. At that point, the pharmacy retained our firm, and we immediately sprung into action to reverse the impending termination on short notice.
Successful PBM Appeals Often Require Legal Advocacy
Throughout the appeal process, HLA's experienced healthcare defense attorneys meticulously presented documentation and legal analysis that systematically addressed the PBM's alleged violations and demonstrated that either no violation occurred, or that any violation was an isolated error that did not support termination. Specifically, we combine our arguments on the facts with extensive legal research and analysis demonstrating why the PBM is not entitled to terminate the agreement at issue under relevant federal, state, and common law.
HLA's Legal Methods are Tailored to Each Case
Our method for approaching these cases is to present the client's narrative and facts in a convincing and compelling fashion, relying on our subject matter expertise, to explain why vague statements in a manual do not prohibit or apply to the facts at issue. In addition, it is important to address the PBM's concern that the conduct at issue not recur. Accordingly, because our firm employs the former Chief Compliance Officer of United Health Group, we are in a position to recommend tailored compliance strategies that the PBMs will accept in mitigation.
As part of our work in this case, our healthcare compliance specialists implemented new standard operating procedures, updated policies, and retrained staff, convincing the PBM to reinstate the pharmacy based on improved compliance protocols. This often tips the balance towards reinstatement.
Network Termination Can be Avoided
We work on many network appeals, so we can be efficient in budgeting to achieve desirable results. In this case, the pharmacy was about to be sold to a new owner, and the network termination obviously destroyed a lot of that value. By winning network reinstatement on appeal, we were able to dramatically increase the owner's return on investment. Nonetheless, if you are at risk of termination, the earlier you involve qualified counsel, the better. We are always available to help.
MORE ARTICLES BY CATEGORY
Health Law Alliance Secures Major Victory as Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against Independent Pharmacies
Health Law Alliance secured a major win for independent pharmacies with the dismissal of Cardinal Health’s lawsuit, exposing it as a baseless attempt to intimidate smaller providers. This outcome reinforces the firm’s commitment to protecting healthcare businesses from corporate overreach.
Read More >>DOJ’s 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown: What it Means for Telehealth Providers
The DOJ’s 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown charged 324 people in schemes totaling $14 billion in intended losses, including $1.17 billion tied to telemedicine and genetic‑testing fraud that implicated 49 defendants - signaling the government’s continued crack‑down on virtual‑care abuses. The surge in criminal and civil actions, coupled with CMS suspensions and the new DOJ‑HHS False Claims Act Working Group, warns telehealth providers to rigorously audit their compliance practices or risk severe penalties and exclusion from federal programs.
Read More >>Telehealth Audit Season: OIG Found 7 Percent Error Rate in Pandemic-Era E/M Billing
A 2024 OIG study found that 7% of E/M services billed during the pandemic were noncompliant with Medicare billing requirements. We break down OIG’s findings and explain what they mean in an era where RPM audits are on the rise.
Read More >>Health Law Alliance Earns Reinstatement for DME Supplier Whose Medicare Billing Privileges Were Unjustly Revoked
Due to Health Law Alliance’s advocacy, a prominent DME vendor in Texas had their billing privileges reinstated this week, without having to jump through the arduous, costly hoops of a fair hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge or a Departmental Appeals Board review.
Read More >>
