PBMs are increasingly terminating pharmacies for minor infractions of the provider manuals or network enrollment forms. These terminations are contrary to the PBM's obligations under law and the parties' agreements, and may have collateral consequences if the underlying allegations involve wrongdoing. In this case, we profile the steps that led to a successful network reinstatement for an Illinois pharmacy.

Our client, an Illinois pharmacy, was targeted by a major PBM with cease-and-desist notices that alleged violations of the Provider Manual. Although the pharmacy responded to the PBM in an attempt to address the allegations, the PBM terminated the pharmacy anyway. At that point, the pharmacy retained our firm, and we immediately sprung into action to reverse the impending termination on short notice.

Successful PBM Appeals Often Require Legal Advocacy

Throughout the appeal process, HLA's experienced healthcare defense attorneys meticulously presented documentation and legal analysis that systematically addressed the PBM's alleged violations and demonstrated that either no violation occurred, or that any violation was an isolated error that did not support termination. Specifically, we combine our arguments on the facts with extensive legal research and analysis demonstrating why the PBM is not entitled to terminate the agreement at issue under relevant federal, state, and common law.

HLA's Legal Methods are Tailored to Each Case

Our method for approaching these cases is to present the client's narrative and facts in a convincing and compelling fashion, relying on our subject matter expertise, to explain why vague statements in a manual do not prohibit or apply to the facts at issue. In addition, it is important to address the PBM's concern that the conduct at issue not recur. Accordingly, because our firm employs the former Chief Compliance Officer of United Health Group, we are in a position to recommend tailored compliance strategies that the PBMs will accept in mitigation.

As part of our work in this case, our healthcare compliance specialists implemented new standard operating procedures, updated policies, and retrained staff, convincing the PBM to reinstate the pharmacy based on improved compliance protocols. This often tips the balance towards reinstatement.

Network Termination Can be Avoided

We work on many network appeals, so we can be efficient in budgeting to achieve desirable results. In this case, the pharmacy was about to be sold to a new owner, and the network termination obviously destroyed a lot of that value. By winning network reinstatement on appeal, we were able to dramatically increase the owner's return on investment. Nonetheless, if you are at risk of termination, the earlier you involve qualified counsel, the better. We are always available to help.

Frequently Asked Questions

HLA Convinces Optum to Reverse PBM Audit Termination

Health Law Alliance is pleased to announce that Optum recently agreed to reverse its network termination of a Texas pharmacy client despite significant claim discrepancies based on inventory shortages, patient denials, and other alleged violations of the terms and conditions of the Provider Manual and network enrollment agreements.

Read More >>

HLA's Lawsuit Against Optum Achieves Return of Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars in Withheld Reimbursement

Health Law Alliance's lawsuit against Optum has resulted in the immediate release of hundreds of thousands of dollars in reimbursement that Optum unlawfully refused to release to our client prior to being sued.

Read More >>

HLA Attorney Anthony Mahajan Wins Dismissal of False Claims Lawsuit Against Oncology Dispensing Practice

Health Law Alliance's Anthony Mahajan is pleased to announce the complete dismissal of a lawsuit brought on behalf of the federal government against a cancer care provider for the submission of false Medicare claims for oncology drugs.

Read More >>

HLA Files Emergency Texas Lawsuit Against Optum PBM Audit Termination

Health Law Alliance announces the filing of an emergency lawsuit in federal court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, to stop Optum's termination of an independent pharmacy that dispensed medications on telemedicine prescriptions and force Optum to comply with federal and state "prompt payment" laws that prohibit withholding of reimbursement.

Read More >>