.png)
Just days after we sued Optum in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, Optum immediately released approximately $250,000 in reimbursement that it had unlawfully withheld from our client for more than six months on the basis of non-existent PBM audit discrepancies. The fact that we had to sue Optum to obtain this relief serves as another example of the extent to which PBMs abuse their market position at the expense of network pharmacies.
Texas Lawsuit to Stop PBM Audit Violations is Continuing
Although Optum has now returned our client's money, we do not intend to stop there. We have filed an Amended Complaint that alleges that United Health is applying different PBM audit metrics and standards to pharmacies that service beneficiaries of United Healthcare's Part C Medicare Advantage capitated plans than other network pharmacies.
If you have been targeted for a PBM audit focused on claims for Medicare Advantage AARP members, or other United Healthcare sponsored plans, our experienced healthcare attorneys are available to defend the PBM audit.
Texas PBM Reform Permits Mail-Order Deliveries
In our case, Optum's PBM audit alleged that certain of the pharmacy's claims were invalid because they had been delivered by mail to patients located hundreds of miles away.
In Texas, however, PBM reform laws expressly forbid payors and PBMs from barring mail-order delivery. Accordingly, if you are a Texas provider and have been targeted for a PBM audit based on mail order deliveries, we can help you hold PBMs like Optum accountable to their legal obligations.
PBMs are Prohibited from Withholding Reimbursement
Many laws prohibit PBMs from refusing to reimburse "clean claims" within certain time periods. In our case, Optum withheld reimbursement due the pharmacy in violation of such "prompt pay" laws for more than six months. Once we sued Optum, it was forced to comply with the law.
Nonetheless, there may be scenarios in which a PBM is permitted by the terms of its agreements to hold funds pending completion of an audit. The extent to which a PBM may withhold reimbursement due and owing on certain claims pending an audit of other claims is highly dependent on the facts and legal obligations at play.
Nationwide PBM Audit Specialists
Although our lawsuit against Optum was filed in Dallas, Texas, our firm assists pharmacies and providers nationwide to defend PBM and payor audits. If you have been selected for a PBM audit, are appealing the results of that audit, or are facing network termination as a result of discrepant audit findings, our PBM audit defense specialists are available to help. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I join HLA's lawsuit against Optum Rx for PBM audit termination?
Unfortunately, PBM provider manuals contain provisions that prohibit "class actions," meaning the joining of multiple plaintiffs against a defendant in one complaint.
Am I able to file a lawsuit against Optum Rx for PBM audit violations?
Yes, you are entitled to file a lawsuit in federal or state court to hold the PBM accountable for PBM audit violations. Ultimately, however, lawsuits should be a remedy of last resort if PBM audit negotiations fail.
What are the costs associated with filing a PBM audit lawsuit?
Legal fees and expenses vary depending on the nature of the lawsuit and claims involved. Some PBM audit lawsuits may be resolved quickly, whereas others may take longer or be referred to arbitration. Finally, certain claims may be eligible for "contingent fee" arrangements, particularly if you are a specialty pharmacy with high DIR claw-backs.
HLA Convinces Optum to Reverse PBM Audit Termination
Health Law Alliance is pleased to announce that Optum recently agreed to reverse its network termination of a Texas pharmacy client despite significant claim discrepancies based on inventory shortages, patient denials, and other alleged violations of the terms and conditions of the Provider Manual and network enrollment agreements.
Read More >>HLA Attorney Anthony Mahajan Wins Dismissal of False Claims Lawsuit Against Oncology Dispensing Practice
Health Law Alliance's Anthony Mahajan is pleased to announce the complete dismissal of a lawsuit brought on behalf of the federal government against a cancer care provider for the submission of false Medicare claims for oncology drugs.
Read More >>HLA Files Emergency Texas Lawsuit Against Optum PBM Audit Termination
Health Law Alliance announces the filing of an emergency lawsuit in federal court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, to stop Optum's termination of an independent pharmacy that dispensed medications on telemedicine prescriptions and force Optum to comply with federal and state "prompt payment" laws that prohibit withholding of reimbursement.
Read More >>Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) Face Possible FTC Lawsuit
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plans to sue the top Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) for anti-competitive practices, including influencing drug prices and favoring their own networks, which disadvantage independent pharmacies and raise prescription drug costs.
Read More >>.png)