PBM audits may result in collateral consequences, including licensing and disciplinary proceedings. In this case, HLA's experienced defense attorneys successfully convinced the State Board to decline further investigation, effectively resolving the matter at an early stage.

Our client, a Philadelphia pharmacy, was referred to the Prosecution Division of the Pennsylvania Department of State's Office of Chief Counsel following a PBM audit that noted violations. After the pharmacy retained HLA, the State declined to prosecute the case.

PBM audit

PBM Audits May Result in Referrals

We have written extensively about how PBM audits can lead to collateral consequences, including referral to state Medicaid agencies and Boards of Pharmacy. Accordingly, PBM audits need to be handled with extreme care, particularly when dealing with the larger PBMs or payors, most of whom cultivate close relationships with state and federal agencies.

In fact, PBM and payors often hire claims auditors and investigators from agencies such as the Department of Insurance or Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. In Pennsylvania, Keystone maintains particularly close relationships with federal and state agencies.

If you would like to read more about PBM audits and important considerations, please sign-up HERE for our complimentary, 10-part PBM Audit Guide.

HLA's Defense Strategy

Because our attorneys have worked as federal and state regulators, we understand the considerations at play. Overall, we use that insight to present our client's narrative in a convincing and compelling manner to assuage any regulatory concerns. In addition, it is always important to provide convincing evidence that the conduct at issue is isolated, and will not recur.

State Officials Declined to Prosecute

Based on our factual and legal arguments, the State declined to take further action and closed its file. We are grateful to the State for their consideration, as we strive to achieve successful outcomes as early in the process as possible. This approach is not only efficient for all involved, but spares the stress and anxiety involved in a drawn-out dispute.

With HLA's assistance, our client achieved a speedy and efficient final resolution, and can now refocus his energy where it should be, on running his business.

Frequently Asked Questions

HLA Convinces Optum to Reverse PBM Audit Termination

Health Law Alliance is pleased to announce that Optum recently agreed to reverse its network termination of a Texas pharmacy client despite significant claim discrepancies based on inventory shortages, patient denials, and other alleged violations of the terms and conditions of the Provider Manual and network enrollment agreements.

Read More >>

HLA's Lawsuit Against Optum Achieves Return of Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars in Withheld Reimbursement

Health Law Alliance's lawsuit against Optum has resulted in the immediate release of hundreds of thousands of dollars in reimbursement that Optum unlawfully refused to release to our client prior to being sued.

Read More >>

HLA Attorney Anthony Mahajan Wins Dismissal of False Claims Lawsuit Against Oncology Dispensing Practice

Health Law Alliance's Anthony Mahajan is pleased to announce the complete dismissal of a lawsuit brought on behalf of the federal government against a cancer care provider for the submission of false Medicare claims for oncology drugs.

Read More >>

HLA Files Emergency Texas Lawsuit Against Optum PBM Audit Termination

Health Law Alliance announces the filing of an emergency lawsuit in federal court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, to stop Optum's termination of an independent pharmacy that dispensed medications on telemedicine prescriptions and force Optum to comply with federal and state "prompt payment" laws that prohibit withholding of reimbursement.

Read More >>